Thursday
6th September promises to be a red letter day for connoisseurs of
sporting administration in the North East. Firstly, the Northern League Management
Committee are meeting to discuss the ramifications of Blyth AFC’s resignation
on the rest of the first division, which is now down to 18 teams with
potentially 2 of those idle each weekend. There are fines to be handed down and
fixture rearrangements to be considered. Additionally, the NEPL convenes to
discuss the situation for 2019, whereby there are 3 vacancies to fill; Seaham
Harbour’s demise over the winter, Durham County Cricket Club’s decision to
mothball their Academy side, possibly for reasons of cost or the paucity of
emerging talent, and the expulsion of Brandon from NEPL 1 for failing to attain
Clubmark status, which is basically the cricketing equivalent of FA Charter
Status, have caused this situation. As it stands, the clubs ready to fill the
vacancies are Crook from the DCL, as well as Shotley Bridge and Ashington from
the NTCL. These neophytes, as well as a proposal to dispense with relegation
from the Premier Division, meaning Burnopfield will simply replace Durham
Academy, need to be voted through by the clubs. In essence the Management
Committee are proposing the bottom side in the Premier Division is given a free
pass to avoid relegation, much in the way the clubs decided to dispense with
relegation from Division 1 once Seaham Harbour had left the league. Ambitious
Division 1 clubs may not be so understanding this time. Finally, there’s the
question of Stockton’s oft-stated desire to move to the NYSD league, though
they missed the 31st July resignation date. There’s undoubtedly a recipe for hot air and
hot tempers.
Meanwhile,
the North East Midweek Cricket League holds its AGM at Blue Flames, with awards
and a buffet following the main business of the meeting. With Captain Mark
playing on the trains and Hot Les in Germany for a wedding, it looks like I’ll
get the gig as Bad Boys representative on the night we have our promotion to
Division 2 rubber stamped. Full speed ahead for games against Civil Service,
Cramlington, Genetics, The Main and Merz & McClellan, as well as renewing
rivalries with Bates Cottages and Sparta who were promoted with us. More about this in the end of season cricket
blog, which will be next week’s job of work, written through floods of tears at
the passing of another summer.
Never
mind Thursday, there’s also the small matter of Wednesday 5th to
discuss. Remember back to February 1st when True Faith ran a night at the Irish Club where a load of
journalists, and Martin Hardy, pontificated about the fortunes of Newcastle
United after another transfer window of inactivity? Obviously, I didn’t go;
Mogwai were on at Northumbria and that’s where the cool kids were. On September
5th, they’ll be at the clash of the North Tyneside non-league titans
when Benfield host Whitley Bay. The alternative is hunkering down for another
evening of righteous chest-thrashing and charity shop demagoguery as the
creaking edifice of the Magpie Group has called a public meeting to discuss the
next steps forward in their faltering campaign to save Newcastle United. As
they believe Ashley is to blame for the current plight of the club and not
Benitez, I won’t be with them in spirit either; unless they adopt a policy of
boycotting games, when I’ll stand with them, giving critical support. I said
last time around that the only stances I could admire were the absolutists practising
absenteeism and the apoliticals still attending. I mentioned NUFC.com as principled
examples of the latter; perhaps it didn’t go down too well with Friends of
Martin Hardy, as Mike Bolam pointedly blanked me outside Platform 2 in
Tynemouth Station (if you’ve not been; go immediately as the beer’s brilliant)
last Thursday. Who can tell?
As
far as the Magpie Group is concerned, it appears that in their wish to serve
the wishes and agenda of all their constituent parts, they are suffering what
Freud and Lacan referred to as the narcissism of small differences. Freud
initially posited that the collective narcissism of those involved in what is
ostensibly a group task or relationship, will inevitably result in
manifestations of aggression. Lacan refined this theory to include the presence
of envy, essentially defining passive aggression, as well as suggesting this
can be measured on an intragroup conflict scale.
Certainly,
Lacan’s thinking explains why these boys made a hell of a mess when trying to
organise a demonstration outside Sports
Direct and a flag waving march from The North Terrace, three hours and one
hour respectively, before the Chelsea game. A fortnight before, the
demonstration before the Spurs game had been loud, well-attended and
impressive, despite
the presence of the usual half dozen Leninist headcases from Taaffe’s SPEW
Vanguard trying to organise some sort of mass workers’ movement. Unfortunately,
Walter Benjamin’s prophecy in Das
Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit came true on a
soaking Sunday, when an accurate reproduction of the initial experience before
Spurs failed spectacularly, as Guy De Bord would no doubt agree. The fact it lashed it down all day is probably
why Newcastle fans showed themselves to be Fairweather Revolutionaries and
conspicuously blanked the event. The failed protest wasn’t the worst thing
about that day, neither was Yedlin’s unfortunate own goal that snatched a
precious point away. The very worst thing was the absolute low life who stole
the “Pavel is a Geordie” flag at full time. I’m no particular lover of flags,
but that banner was one of the very few things every NUFC bought into, as it
remembered a late, lamented terrace hero. Whoever stole it ought to be
absolutely ashamed of their conduct. Thank goodness it has been returned.
Now
I’m not saying the calamitous decrease in protestors on Northumberland Street
when compared to the Spurs game was comparable to the fact the Pope’s simultaneous
Phoenix Park gig attracted a million less Holy Joes, devout cripples and
clericofascist nutters than the 1979 tour had, but there are similarities. While
accepting that, of course, Leeds and Everton would have taken more, the smaller
than anticipated showing of Holy Sight Seers at Phoenix Park wasn’t because of
a fear of encountering Emmett Stagg in the Jax, but because the Catholic Church
hasn’t had a great last 40 years in Ireland, to be frank. The situation, as a
result of the 26 counties pretty much abandoning the Mother Church has resulted
in a society that is considerably more tolerant, inclusive and multi-ethnic
than the 6 counties, can’t be ignored. Religion, except among the culchies, is
dying. Observance and obsequiousness are gone; they have been replaced by the
great symphony of indifference. While 200K delusional taigs assembled to hear
Pope Francis blether on, about 30,000 assembled to protest about historical
sexual abuse by the Catholic Church and the Tuam Baby Home scandal. This is not
an inconsiderable number of those seeking to finally gain justice for the
appalling crimes of the church, which were compounded by organisational
indifference and obfuscation, but the cold, hard fact is far, far more Irish
citizens sat on their backsides and watched it on the telly than worshipped or
demonstrated. The
Magpie Group would do well to note this and not assume the presence of a
definite majority of unquestioning opposition to Ashley’s ownership among the
support as a whole.
This
week is a brief period of respite for those concerned with Newcastle United. In
the Premier League, the team sit in 18th, the final relegation spot
that they last occupied at New Year. After 4 games, the team have lost 2-1 on
three separate occasions, scoring brilliant consolation goals in each game and
doing their very best to ensure damage limitation. To an extent, it has worked.
There have been few grumbles about the losses to Spurs, Chelsea and Manchester
City; this tolerance will be tested if the visit of Arsenal, who appear to be
managed by Dave Vanian’s body double, results in a defeat on 15th
September. At least that game won’t be on television, unlike the 5 winless
performances before the international break.
While
losing to the stellar trio by a single goal is excusable, the more significant
debacles were the ones at Cardiff and Nottingham Forest. In South Wales, the
whole rancid afternoon could have been saved if Kenedy had scored the penalty,
but his miss summed up a catastrophic 90 minutes that preceded it. The Forest
game saw a stonewall penalty waved away in the last seconds, but even if it had
been awarded and scored, the shameful way Karanka’s side outperformed even NUFC
player apart from the superb Sean Longstaff needs to be recognised. In both
games, an utter lack of any attacking intent or pattern of play resulted in a
furious response on social media. Most angry hot heads somehow extrapolated
that Ashley was to blame for the team’s inadequate displays, though finally the
penny seems to have dropped among a growing section of the support that
Benitez’s dinosaur tactics may just be a factor to why we’re doing so badly. Of
course, any criticism of Benitez was shouted down in immoderate language.
Jacques
Derrida called this one best; his theory of “phallogocentrism,” a theory that combined
the dual concepts of “logocentrism” and “phallocentrism,” refers to the
privileging of the masculine (phallus) in the construction of meaning. Derrida’s
phallogocentric argument is premised on the claim that modern Western culture
has been culturally and intellectually subjugated by logocentrism, the
philosophy of determinateness, while phallocentrism is the way logocentrism
itself has been genderised by a phallic and patriarchal agenda.
In
the current time, this means the narrative of blame regarding Newcastle United
has been railroaded by loud, male voices to apportion all responsibility to
Mike Ashley. As an aside, David Ryle’s photos of the degeneration of SJP that
went viral on social media point to a clear lack of investment in the club’s
infrastructure, where responsibility must be Ashley’s. This is apodictic or
determinate knowledge; the visual evidence is compelling and could not be
contradicted. In short, this is truth.
Unfortunately,
in matters of interpretation, the situation is more complex as the spectre of indeterminateness
becomes relevant. According to Derrida indeterminate or aporetic knowledge is
"based on contradictory ideas ("aporias") that make it
impossible to determine matters of truth with any degree of certitude, because
the “facts,” such as they are, are open to contradictory interpretations. In short, blaming Mike Ashley for Newcastle
United’s current position in the table is as logical an interpretation of “facts”
as blaming Benitez. “Truth,” as far as it can be defined in aporetic terms, is
based on opinion when it is indeterminate.
Returning
to apodictic analysis; it is clear that Newcastle United’s current situation
may get even worse unless Benitez can put his own agenda to one side and
attempt to fashion a decent team out of the constituent parts of his squad.
No comments:
Post a Comment