I know this isn’t one of my cultural blogs, which
tend to get about 10% of the audience my football related pieces get, but I’d
like to start off with a review of a book; David Goldblatt’s Game of Our Lives: The Cultural Politics of
English Football, which is the first essential thing I’ve read in 2015.
Goldblatt is an academic, football fan and author, who combines a clear left
wing sociological perspective (though avoiding the mendacious opportunism of
avaricious Trotskyites) with a deep and abiding love for Tottenham Hotspur and
an adopted affection for Bristol Rovers. As a teaching academic, he is aware of
the importance of lucid prose and a strong authorial voice, where the
ideological viewpoint is crystal clear. He manages this with aplomb and his book
is consequently both a joy and an inspiration; nowhere else could I imagine
nodding in furious agreement with relentless haranguing of all that is wrong
with the game, while simultaneously finding myself wrapt with nostalgic joy at
anecdotes and asides about the history and culture of the game, which
encapsulates both the past, the present and the potential future of all aspects
of the game. He may not namecheck every one of the 92 league clubs by name, but
he comes damn close, showing his learning lightly and effortlessly throughout
the whole book. I urge every one of you to go out and read this book; you will
not regret it and hopefully you will be as inspired by the contents as I was.
I’m very aware of appointing the equivalent of a
fans’ Pied Piper, but Goldblatt is nothing like that; he’s a democrat and of
unimpeachable moral probity. He doesn’t want to be a fans’ leader; he is simply
blessed with an intelligence and articulacy that enables him to vocalise what
so many of us instinctively feel, but may struggle to phrase effectively. Before
Christmas I was contacted by Tom Reed of Stand
fanzine, asking if I could attend a meeting in Crouch End at the end of
November about fan engagement, which David was chairing. It was a non-starter
for many reasons, mainly to do with work, but David was encouraged enough by
discussions with Tom and me to suggest a similar meeting on Tyneside early in
2015, charging me with the responsibility of organising it. This is where
things became difficult. In the past, I’ve made literary allusions to Samuel
Beckett, Franz Kafka, David Peace and Berthold Brecht in pieces about Newcastle
United. This time, I think we’re talking Eugene Ionesco’s theatre of the
absurd.
Under which organisation’s name could the event
take place? Obviously there’s the Newcastle United Supporter’s Trust (NUST), of
which I am a member and whose AGM was scheduled for 21st January. The
major problem with NUST, an organisation created by the storm of righteous
supporter anger at the disgraceful treatment of Kevin Keegan in 2008, it seems
to me, is that NUST has subsequently lost its campaigning zeal and stagnated to
the point of ossification from 2010 onwards, to the extent that the wider
support, if they even recognise its continued existence, view the Trust with
either indifference or disdain verging on contempt. If they were not seen as a
fit vehicle for such a meeting, and I would privately doubt if the politics and
personalities involved with NUST at the board level would countenance involvement
with anything I suggested, then who?
The only viable answer was the vibrant and
inclusive independent supporters network NUFC Fans United (@NUFCFansUtd), created
in 2012 out of frustration with the inert and ineffectual NUST, who still have
a permanent seat on the official NUFC Fans’ forum, unlike NUST of course, who
got themselves kicked off for breaching protocol after the first meeting. We’re
going over ancient history now, so suffice to say that after last year’s NUST
AGM, where the elected board promised more openness and engagement with the
membership, NUFC Fans United took a step back from organising events to give
NUST a chance to redeem themselves. We gave them the rope, but they couldn’t be
bothered to either corral some new members or hang themselves trying.
In 2014, following NUFC Fans United’s policy
decision to take a step back from organising meetings, NUST had a chance of
really pushing on with 3 newly elected board members: Graeme Cansdale and
Ciaran Donaghy, who I know to be lifelong Newcastle United fans, and Michael
Martin, who edited the magazine True Faith
when it existed in print form and I now believe runs their website. However,
2014 was not a good year for NUST as far as I can see. Since their last AGM,
NUST have overseen the farcical and confusing 69 minute walk-out against
Cardiff that was ignored by 90% of the crowd and hosted a pre-match meeting
with Ian Mearns MP and Mary Glindon MP, who are personal friends of members of
NUFC Fans United anyway, of which nothing more was heard. This was the day of
the Hull City game, so at least it wasn’t the most notable fiasco that
afternoon; the Sack Pardew
demonstration (dear oh dear…) breasting the tape in triumphant fashion in that
race to the bottom. In praise of NUST, they launched a credit union which may
be of help for those in serious financial difficulties, though I don’t know the
details of that branch of their activities.
Meanwhile, members of NUFC Fans United continued
to represent supporters on the Fans’ Forum and launched the wildly successful Popular Side fanzine, which produced 5
issues between August and late December, as well as keeping cordial relations
with the whole panoply of Newcastle United supporters. This involved attending
the pre Derby do in The Bridge Hotel
that was organised by the Football Supporters Federation, which is an
organisation I have little time for, not least because of its willingness to
accept money in the form of sponsorship for its annual awards from William Hill
bookmakers. The FSF’s dauphin Michael
Brunskill took an almighty strop with me when I wrote a piece about this in
issue 11 Stand (http://payaso-de-mierda.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/another-hill-of-beans.html),
but that wasn’t the reason I chose not to attend their soiree in The Bridge; Whitley Bay versus North
Shields had my undivided attention that night. And more of that next week, if
I’ve not been silenced by then…
Despite all the brouhaha about Newcastle United
striking a sponsorship deal with Wonga, some people seemed only too pleased to
bask in the reflected glow of the publicity afforded by the FSF annual
awards. I know for certain at The
Popular Side we’d have had nothing to do with a business that exploits
human weakness and greed, but not everyone has our moral standards. We’re
comfortable in our own skin and don’t need to feel vindicated by a bookie
sponsored ego massage. However, if you don’t win, try not to get too upset. Certainly
that could explain the stories of crass rudeness towards Lee Marshall, the NUFC
Supporters’ Liaison Officer and a very personable young man whom I’m delighted
to call an acquaintance. I mean, I wasn’t there, but to try and reach out and
understand what they were going through, perhaps the disappointment affected
their natural bonhomie. Seriously
though, I feel heartily sorry for Lee because of what he endured that night,
but I have to say he’s not the only one to get it in the neck from NUST board
members, whatever (sun)hat they are wearing.
Let’s face it; some people don’t like Mike Ashley.
Some people think it’s acceptable to bracket every NUFC employee alongside the
owner and treat them abominably. Some people think it’s acceptable to reprint
private emails without permission. Some people don’t like The Popular Side. Some people, amazingly enough, don’t like me. All
of those things are acceptable in theory; certainly none of them are hanging
offences, even breaching acceptable boundaries of confidentiality with emails.
However, as an ordinary member of NUST in good standing, I wonder just where
the line is to be drawn regarding acceptable conduct by elected board members
towards ordinary members. I also wonder just what can the ordinary member do to
voice his criticisms of the direction chosen by a supporters’ trust.
Of course I recognise fans fall out with each
other all the time; modern life is like a series of smartphone playground
spats. For goodness sake, just look at the cyber casual brotherhood who tore
each other asunder in the autumn because Grandmaster Sash was proving himself
to be more interested in profit than being a prophet. There were people wearing
Odor Eaters in place of poppies at
the Real Estate gig at the end of October, in memory of all the young men who’d
fallen in senseless slaughter on social media. I’m sure they’ve got over it by
now; some are still on the moral high ground and others are laughing all the
way to the bank. That’s how it goes, but we’re talking about the elected
members of a supporters’ trust here, not an on-line Tufty Club.
I realise that many complex and insecure people
find themselves in public life and struggle to cope with criticism of their
(in)actions. Highly strung and easily led, wracked with self-doubt, these weak
characters often seek the company of supposedly strong male figures of
authority, who can grant them the reassurance they need, whether these
authority figures they flock to have instrumental power, such as club chairmen
or other elected representatives, or influential power, by being overly
aggressive, alpha male gang leaders. In addition there appears to be a certain
strata of volunteer bureaucrats, often to be found in the Trotskyist blind alley of left wing politics, obsessed by notions of their own
infallibility, who luxuriate in power, but struggle with ordinary social
interaction. Perhaps it is part of their DNA, I don’t know, I’m no medical
professional; or perhaps they gain the kudos they crave by acting out the role
of the unblinking tyrant with a clip board, ruling willingly obsequious
underlings with a rod of iron. Whether such roles are adopted out of conscious
or unconscious psychological need, or whether there is an acknowledged element
of implied homoeroticism, I do not know. I’m almost frightened to peek beneath
that Freudian rock and see the bugs clinging to the surface.
Steve Hastie tells the hilarious story of the
Cardiff City trust board member worried that his organisation, designed to
fight back against the Tan regime (well done on getting the shirt colour reversed
by the way), was being high jacked by members of the Soul Crew who simply
wanted to have the away fans moved next to the home end for ease of pre and
post-match paggers. Hilarious and frightening, but that’s democracy. Before
realising that NUST as an organisation was institutionally inert, a number of
us countenanced a simplified Trotskyist policy of entrism to take it over and
try to make it a suitable vehicle for campaigning by winning the elections. On
reflection we abandoned the idea as not worth the effort, but if we’d been
successful, that wouldn’t have been a coup d’etat, it would have been
democracy. Just because you don’t like the message, you can’t stifle freedom of
speech; there is no such thing as a semi democracy.
However I do wonder where NUST is headed, when I
consider the pair of meetings that should have been of interest to all
followers of Newcastle United who seek to do more about the state of our club
than simply whine and grumble about the owner on a variety of social media
platforms, that I attended in the last week.
On Thursday 15th January, NUFC Fans
United hosted a meeting, Fan Inclusion:
Waiting for the Great Leap Forward, at the Tyneside Irish Centre where the
keynote speaker was David Goldblatt. Those who filled the upstairs concert room on a
bitterly cold evening were rewarded with an inspirational talk, whereby David
outlined a draft manifesto for footballing change, outlining the cause and
effect of the rotten core of our national game, the inability of current
legislation and legislators to actively challenge these problems and a series
of suggestions, both practical and theoretical, that could help us to reclaim
football for the people who really matter; the fans. I’m sure the details of
the manifesto will emerge soon, but suffice to say, no-one who cares about the
game can fail to respond to suggestions that ticket pricing, the match day
experience, especially as an away fan, institutional racism, chronic
underfunding of the grassroots, the refusal of many clubs to pay all employees
a living wage and the lack of effective regulation of clubs, owners and
supporters’ trusts, need thorough examination and, in several instances, legal
intervention.
As part of a fact finding tour to take the temperature among committed
activists up and down the country, David had already hosted a gathering in
London before Christmas in conjunction with Stand fanzine and, having
flown up at his own expense (we did treat him to a curry in Café Spice on
Chilli Road afterwards though), was off to Manchester the day after to attend a
similar event, with meetings in other cities in the pipeline. The purpose of
David’s visit was to listen, to learn and refine the 11 point manifesto that
will hopefully, in advance of the May election, provide a coherent document to
encourage politicians to think seriously about our national game. For more than
2 hours, debate was maintained on a wide range of issues with supporters, not
just us lot but those of Middlesbrough and Hull City, a pair of whom had driven
120 miles to be there. Everyone present was able to contribute positive suggestions
in an atmosphere of mutual support and admiration. As the meeting drew to a
close, NUFC Fans United resolved to work hard to ensure that this
appetite for structural change is channeled positively, by holding future
monthly planning meetings for the purpose of organizing an event related to the
launch of the manifesto at a game in April. The Popular Side is fully
behind this and will give any meeting or event maximum publicity in print and
on Twitter.
On Wednesday 21st January, NUST held its Annual General
Meeting at The Mining Institute by Central Station. At the meeting, there were
no apologies asked for or taken and only those NUST board members who spoke announced
their names; consequently I am unsure exactly how many members of the elected
12 member NUST board were actually present, but certainly several were
inexplicably absent, such as Ciaran Donaghy and Mark Jensen. In addition there
was no representative in attendance from either the Football Supporters
Federation or Supporters Direct. If there had been, one wonders exactly how
they would have reacted to the unequivocal announcement by one member of the
NUST board that “public meetings don’t work.” This statement was not a point
for discussion; it was presented as a desperately depressing fact. Frankly I
find the suggestion that a supporters’ trust would no longer seek to provide a
platform for all fans to attend and give their opinions quite staggering and
another reason why, as much as owners and boards of directors should be subject
to regulation as to their activities, we need the regulation of supporter
organisations. Currently, there is no effective regulation of supporters’
trusts; if there were, would NUST still be banned from the NUFC Fans’ Forum?
Who knows? However, the plain truth is that if NUST were an effective vehicle
for fan interaction and representation, there would be no need for NUFC Fans
United to exist.
Simply, I do accept that supporters’ trusts are to an extent hampered
and hidebound by their constitutional requirements, but NUST’s future plans for
contact with members by inviting a select few to attend board meetings or to
hold “surgeries” seemed to me akin to the activities of a constituency Labour
Party in the 1980s; regulations, rules and procedure being more important than activism.
The irony being that during the 46 minute AGM, several NUST board members recognised
the need for campaigns about ticket pricing and the need to pay a living wage,
not to mention calling for an agreed national political strategy in advance of
the election. Unfortunately the endless round of committee meetings with other
trusts will no doubt result in any enthusiasm being squeezed out of a project
that should run in conjunction with the visionary work of David Goldblatt that
will undoubtedly empower and inspire fans across the whole country.
I make no bones about the fact I feel that the attempt to ride the
zeitgeist of spontaneous fan activism as espoused by David Goldblatt has far
more chance of capturing the imagination than the meticulous paper-shuffling of
supporters’ trusts. However, here is a reality check. NUFC Fans United
attracted 31 to the David Goldblatt talk-in and the NUFC Trust AGM was attended
by 23 of the 769 fully paid-up members. Meanwhile, 49,307 watched the
Southampton game and even 509 frozen human peas rattled round the St James Park
pod for the Under 21s game. That is what we are up against; the seeming
indifference, cynicism and despair of 99% of NUFC supporters. The choice is
clear; we either throw our hands up in despair or we grit our teeth and
redouble our efforts to take the argument for greater fan involvement and
better regulation of the game to all fans. As far as I’m concerned, the matter
isn’t up for debate. We don’t despair; we can’t despair. We must keep on
fighting!
Finally, I will always renew my NUST membership each year...
Finally, I will always renew my NUST membership each year...