You’ve
really got to hand it to FIFA and UEFA; the furthest excesses of human
imagination simply could not have come up with such a pair of dysfunctional
administrative bodies as these two
unnatural disaster areas. Patently unfit to rule over the global game, the
brazen behemoths immaculately synthesize corruption, avarice, incompetence and
stupidity with such effortless style. In fact, if Trump’s inner circle and
May’s cabinet (subject to the usual seismic, hourly changes of evil, rapacious,
shape-shifting personnel of course) swapped jobs with the nutcases in Nyon and
zanies in Zurich, they couldn’t do a worse job than in their current roles. In
fact, I doubt any of us would notice the difference.
Before I’m
accused of shooting fish in a barrel by picking on such easy targets as the
sycophantic and scheming suits, who may well have the kind of self-awareness
that makes them accept their utter otiosity, despite radiating the kind of
personal arrogance not seen since the decline of the Mayan Royal Family, let me
point out this really does need to be said. The truth is, since the joyously
unexpected, high water mark of the World Cup, the game’s governing bodies have
once more made international football a brutal, tortuous test of endurance. I’m
not just saying that as a fan of the team mismanaged by Martin O’Neill, who has
failed to bring his tactics out of the Palaeolithic era, whereby the
consecutive 0-0s with the North and then Denmark in mid-November served as the
best argument for the end of partition since Bernadette Devlin floored Reginald
Maudling with a left hook in the House of Commons. I’m saying that as someone
who has come to the conclusion that UEFA are more interested in quadratic
equations, algebraic formulae and the more arcane elements of calculus than
football.
Can it
really be 9 months since the World Cup started? Despite the apocalyptic
predictions of dystopian street warfare, we ended up with the best tournament
in several generations. Almost every team could attack, but hardly any of them
could defend, while referees turned were wise to the kind of reprehensible playacting
that makes you shout at the telly like your old fella watching Rodney Marsh
take theatrical tumbles at Maine Road in late 72. The whole competition was
great, from start to finish. In fact, I even overheard people, basking in the
afterglow of a month’s worth of quality free-to-air football, expressing
enthusiasm for the 2020 European Championships, which is where things become
difficult. Indeed, trying to get my head around the complexities of a
competition that was recently happy to have 8 finalists in 2 groups of 4,
reminded me of the days before pocket calculators, when we old campaigners had
to slog through Maths O Level with only a set of log tables to help us. And if
you complained all you heard was “be thankful you don’t have to use a slide
rule,” whatever that was…
To
understand the 2020 European Championships, you first need to understand the complexities
of the European Nations Cup. There are
55 countries playing in UEFA’s shiny new tournament, including Israel,
presumably to upset Momentum members,
and Turkey, who were the only country to express a firm wish to host the 2020
European Championships, despite most of their stadia being in Asia. Don’t
expect logic from UEFA; the fact is, they’re more likely to carry out their
long promised financial fair play sanctions against Man City and PSG than have
a proper grasp of geography. These 55 countries were ranked in order and split
into 4 Leagues, named from A to D in a 12, 12, 15, 16 division. Further to
that, Leagues A and B were split into 3 team and Leagues C and D into 4 team
groups, with everyone playing each other home and away. In Leagues A to C, the
bottom sides got relegated and in Leagues B to D, the top teams went up.
Relegated from League A
|
Promoted from League B
|
Relegated from League B
|
Promoted from League C
|
Relegated from League C
|
Promoted from League D
|
Croatia
|
Bosnia
|
Ireland
|
Finland
|
Albania
|
Belarus
|
Germany
|
Denmark
|
N. of Ireland
|
Norway
|
Estonia
|
Georgia
|
Iceland
|
Sweden
|
Slovakia
|
Scotland
|
Lithuania
|
Kosovo
|
Poland
|
Ukraine
|
Turkey
|
Serbia
|
Slovenia
|
|
In June, the
4 League A group winners, namely the questionable quartet of England, courtesy
of a 12 minute window of adequacy home to Croatia, Holland, who made Germany
the new crash test dummies of the continent, Switzerland, after they’d
eviscerated a cruising Belgian side, and
Portugal, the first team to qualify, who were also the only country to express any vague
interest in hosting a festival of somnolence that knocks spots off even the
Confederations Cup in terms of irrelevance, play each other in mini tournament at the far western edge of the Iberian
peninsula, made up of a pair of semi-finals, a final and a 3rd place
play off in early June. Does that sound like a pointless and pointlessly
confusing tournament to you? Well, wait until you find out about the qualification
process for 2020, which begins in March 2019 and ends in November 2019.
Now, as a
Newcastle fan I’ve no intrinsic objection to baffling tournaments with
recherche qualification criteria; after all, our last 2 trophies were the 1969
Fairs Cup and the 2007 Inter Toto Cup. However, I’ve really got to take my hat
off to UEFA and put my thinking cap on to comprehend this work of
inconsequential complexity. Having failed to find a credible host nation for
the tournament, the game’s top brass decided instead on 11 host cities, spread
from Dublin to Baku and Glasgow to Bucharest, before the semis and final finish
up at Wembley, presumably as it’s the biggest ground available. The shrouded
this desperate ploy in a tissue of horseshit that proclaimed UEFA were doing
their bit to take the international game to every corner of the continent.
Yeah, righto…
If that
sounds unwieldy, then listen to this; despite not having announced where the
group stages will take place, during which the 24 qualifying teams will be
whittled down to 16 for the knock out stage, only 20 of the 24 spots for the
finals will from the main qualifying process, leaving four spots still to be
decided. The 55 teams will be drawn into 10 groups after the UEFA Nations
League (five groups of five teams and five groups of six teams, with the four
UEFA Nations League Finals participants guaranteed to be drawn into groups of
five teams), with the top two teams in each group qualifying. The draw seeding
will be based on the overall rankings of the Nations League, which was
supposedly the incentive for countries in the bottom tiers not to treat the
Nations League like the sporting equivalent of Comic Relief, where everyone turns up in shit Fancy Dress and nicks
off early to the pub. What a great reward for all the perennial UEFA minnows
though; only 8 hammerings instead of 10. They’ll be dancing in the streets of
Vaduz and Auchtermuchty because of that.
So, and this
is the really great bit, following the qualifying group stage, the qualifying
play-offs will take place in March 2020. The 16 teams of the remaining 35 with
the best record in the Nations League get split into 4 “paths” (I’m not making
this terminology up you know), based on the 4 qualifying Leagues for the
Nations League, with the winners of each “path” needing to come through a pair
of 2 leg ties to get a place in the Euros. There will be a “path” made up from
each of Leagues A to D countries
who finished third, fourth or perhaps lower in the 10 Euro 2020 qualifying
groups. We’ve gone from the simplicity of the beautiful game, to a kind of
speed-dating repĂȘchage meets pass the parcel, whereby the likes of Moldova and Cyprus
will grind out a pair of attritional 0-0 draws and an interminable penalty
shootout, for the honour of securing a chance to be pasted by Belgium or France.
Frankly, we
may as well do away with domestic leagues if all we’re going to be doing is
attempting to qualify for tournament finals 365 days a year. After all, there’s
the small matter of the next UEFA Nations League in 2021, before we get to the
sporting epicentre of venal corruption, when we all head to the pop-up
tournament built on the spilled blood and unmarked graves of forced migrant
labour; Qatar 2022.
Curiously,
an end to the mundane treadmill of domestic football is probably something FIFA’s
Grand Poobah Gianni Infantino would
be pleased to introduce. You see the problem with the meritocratic principle in
football is that it occasionally produces unpleasant results, like Leicester
winning the title and gate-crashing the Champions’ League cartel, or Real
Madrid having a crap season and looking likely to miss out on qualification.
Clearly, this is not what the storied legions of sponsors want. You’d find the
monolithic football corporations operating in Spain, England and Italy, though
one hopes not Germany whose laws demand purity in both beer production and
football club ownership, are vehemently opposed to uninvited outsiders trying
to get their snouts in the trough and feet under the table. For Manchester City
and Paris St Germain, their particular interpretation of the concept of
Financial Fair Play is keeping as much cash as they can for themselves and
cutting their floundering domestic rivals adrift. What the avaricious football
megacorps want is a semi-hermetically sealed European Super League, to maximise
income streams and avoid the minimal prospect of any team of talented outsiders
upsetting the apple cartel by the vulgar expedient of actually daring to win
something that should, by divine right, belong exclusively to the big boys. And
don’t you just know that if this ever got off the ground, Ajax, Benfica, Celtic
and a school of big fish from tiny ponds would be demanding a European Super
League second tier.
Thankfully
FIFA, in the shape of Le Grand Fromage
Infantino are dead against such plans, as the last thing FIFA wants is a
breakaway European Super League. Infantino has announced himself ready to start
a fight to cut out the cancer of bent and twisted Corinthianism in our sport
with the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of FIFA fair play, by
banning for life any players who take part in such a competition. Fantastic to
see a footballing reference to Colombia that relates to the 1948 El Dorado financial fiasco that led to
bans for Alberto Di Stefano, Charlie Mitten and Neil Franklin, rather than a
sordid tabloid confessional by a failed second tier starlet who lost it all
after he was caught on CCTV doing bugle off his credit club in the bogs of a
Droitwich nitespot.
Of course,
there is nothing remotely honourable about FIFA’s opposition. The thing is, Saint
Gianni reckons he has the solution to all the game’s ills; we simply need a
FIFA club World Cup. After all, we all know just how fabulously successful and
widely ignored the annual World Club Championships have been. In fact, the only
time it ever crossed my consciousness was when Man Utd dropped out the FA Cup
and the third round got played before Christmas in 1999/2000. That was a bad
idea and was never replicated. Same as the dismal Premier League experiment of
playing the Cup Final before the closing
round of league games. Other than the play-offs, I can’t think of a single
administrative bright idea that has done the game any tangible good, unlike
playing modifications like giving attackers the benefit of the doubt for
offsides and banning keepers picking up back passes.
There’s a
lesson in all of this; if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it. Now close your eyes
and remember Germany imploding against South Korea or Belgium storming away to
get the winner in the Japan game. That’s what football is about; poetry not
maths. Keep it simple. Keep it clean.
No comments:
Post a Comment