I really hated Saturday 17th November 2012;
Heaton Winstons lost, Percy Main lost (6-1 at home), Benfield lost (5-1 at
Spennymoor), Hibs lost and Newcastle lost at home for the second week in a row.
The evening session was cancelled, but at least when I got home, my partner had
not only prepared a rather fine pasta dish, she’d also bought me a new pair of
strides. They’re great; Union Jeans from Seattle: straight
leg, dark blue, slightly distressed (not sure what by), still with the tags on,
from Tynemouth Station Market, which is the North East’s finest source of
second hand vinyl, books and all the other sorts of memorabilia I spent my 30s
getting rid of and 40s buying back. Even better, these beauties cost the
princely sum of £2. I love a bargain me. I own 2 other pairs of jeans; Levi
501s price £6 from Oxfam in Whitley Bay and some
stylish Primark ones that cost £4 brand new. It’s fair to say I’m not
at the cutting edge of terrace casual culture; then again, I don’t want to be.
Mainly because, I simply can’t afford to be.
I’m almost 49, with £90k still on my mortgage. I’m divorced
with a son applying to University to do History (the subject with the highest
graduate unemployment) who I’m supporting through his A Levels. I’ve got a
good, well-paid job, but the idea of spending £300 on a jacket for going to
football is a complete non-starter, especially when I couldn’t afford to attend
an away game to show it off in the first place. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not
part of the replica shirted Sports Direct Delta /Epsilon border
underclass demographic, but I do think we, as football fans, need to accept
that there is a third path between the shirters and the dressers that need not
involve appearing to be a walking Val Doonican tribute, attired entirely in the
latest releases from the M&S Blue Harbour catalogue,
in a signature yellow polo shirt. I’ve loved the first two issues of Stand
AMF, but I really think it has to be acknowledged that paying fifty
quid for a pair of socks doesn’t automatically entitle you to assume you’re at
the forefront of the battle to reclaim the game’s soul. The snobbery of the no
kit wankers and ageing casuals is as irritating as the lack of self-awareness
of the club shop clowns.
The first Newcastle away game I attended was a 1-1 draw at
Ayresome Park in February 1983; I was 18. While the vast majority of our
support appeared to regard NCB donkey jackets, black & white tartan scarves
and moustaches as the correct terrace apparel, I was a little differently
dressed in Dennis the Menace style mohair jumper, combat trousers and long
overcoat with compulsory Unknown Pleasures badge. I looked
like the scruffy student I was. A couple of years later, I did notice the
appearance of slightly more fashion conscious individuals among a travelling
support that tended to be somewhat lacking in the sartorial stakes. One of
these lads, Snag from Felling, informed me as we left White Hart Lane after a
late Beardsley effort gained us a 1-1 draw in August 86 that when it came to
away games, it was responsibility of our support to “dress smart; act potty.” I tried to internalise this, but it didn’t
really permeate my consciousness. Fast forward to the end of the decade, I
welcomed the arrival of the 1990s at Boundary Park, watching Mark Stimson’s
injury time own goal limit us to a single point, clothed in bike jacket, Butthole
Surfers t-shirt, lumberjack shirt, split kneed 501s and paint spattered
7 hole DMs. It’s not just my new Union Jeans; I’ve long looked upon
Seattle as an influence on my wardrobe.
I applaud lads who’ve enough spare cash, time to play on Ebay
and dress sense to turn out smart, though I despair at my young’un and his
mates in Pretty Green polos and knitwear Ken Barlow would look good in.
However, I’m happy enough in my car boot sale jeans, Ex Catalogue Shop shirt
and hand me down Quicksilver jacket; I might look like a dick, but as I’m nearly
50, perhaps that’s no bad thing. Let’s embrace inclusivity, even if means being
unkempt.
This is an updated version of an article I submitted to "Stand AMF," which will appear in issue #3 in a slightly different form....
ReplyDelete